Gossip isn’t just noise in Bollywood—it’s bending how people judge films. A heated online discussion flags Indian review channels for shallow takes and celeb bias, naming examples like Jammy and 5ocial and even taking aim at War 2 as a test case [1].
What the thread highlights • Jammy's critiques skim surface; he frequently mentions cinematography, lighting, and set design but rarely digs into how these choices shape character or narrative, leaving viewers with the “what” and not the “why.” [1] • 5ocial's scripts feel AI-generated with Letterboxd buzzwords and screenplay scaffolding rather than genuine cinephile insight, making reviews sound polished but short on reasoning. [1] • War 2's reception in the discussion treats it as evidence of a single-genre action spy universe, padding praise with hype rather than probing its craft or themes. [1] • Bias toward certain celebs colors the take, muddying what counts as a credible critique and shaping audience trust. [1]
Impact on public perception When fans lean on chatter over critique, credibility erodes and industry narratives can skew toward entertainment gossip instead of craft. The thread frames this as a credibility risk for outlets and for viewers seeking thoughtful tips [1]. A push for deeper, more transparent analysis could restore trust and set clearer standards for what counts as legitimate critique.
Takeaway: demand depth, and treat celebrity chatter as a garnish—not the main course. [1]
References
The Problem with Tried and Refused Productions & Other Indian Movie Reviewers
Criticizes Bollywood review channels for shallow analysis, bias toward celebs; discusses Jammy, 5ocial, War 2, Kantara, and Rishabh Shetty today.
View source