AI in Indian cinema isn't sci‑fi anymore. The Mahabharat show uses AI-generated actors, and viewers are buzzing about ethics, budgets, star power, and authenticity—plus what it means if Jio-backed projects push this further [1].
Ethics and authenticity – AI casting raises big questions about human artistry and whether machine-made performances can truly carry emotion on screen [1].
Fan reception and realism – Some comments call the AI “too AI” and the actors look robotic; others wonder if animation could have nailed it better [1].
Budget, star power, and hype – Viewers note that big budgets and iconic stars can help recover costs, especially when religious or sentimental factors drive demand; one line reads, “It will be easy to recover the budget,” in this context [1]. There’s chatter that Adipurush opened big with its trailer, signaling hype still sells [1]. A fellow commenter even suggests religion isn’t the only driver for big openings [1].
Industry implications – Some argue AI could democratize entry for small creators, while others fear art is slipping from human hands and that jobs for actors may be at risk [1]. One critic frames art as a human expression—an ethical boundary that AI will have to navigate [1].
Closing thought: the all‑AI casting debate in 2025 India is far from settled—expect sharper opinions and more experiments ahead.
References
Do you think a fully AI generated movies, like this Mahabharat show, will work?
Discussion on AI actors in Indian cinema, ethics, fan reception, budget, star power, authenticity, and potential industry impact.
View source