Ananya Panday’s 13th film is officially underway, and the nepotism debate is back in the spotlight [1]. Proponents argue that ‘nepo kids’ keep landing projects even after flops or audience rejection, while critics say merit should govern who gets cast. The thread anchors this in Ananya’s ongoing slate and the perception that fame buys more chances than feedback does.
Industry dynamics — The discussion leans into a pattern: family connections appear to sustain opportunities even when projects stumble. Some fans point to Liger discussions as a touchstone, arguing that a single title shouldn’t define a career, while others insist repeated opportunities signal a systemic bias [1].
Audience perceptions — Viewers foreground merit versus lineage, with many calling for a level playing field where audience response matters most. The debate isn’t just about one actress; it’s about how fandom frames talent, risk, and opportunity in today’s Bollywood [1].
Counterpoints and comparisons — Voices cite Emraan Hashmi as a counterpoint: an established name whose career blends hits, misses, and memorable moments, challenging the notion that lineage alone guarantees screen time [1]. The thread also brings up Ahaan Panday as the cousin who reportedly lands roles early, fueling the ongoing family-leverage argument [1].
Closing thought: with new projects rolling out, fans will keep weighing talent, timing, and lineage as Bollywood evolves—and the nepotism conversation isn’t going away anytime soon [1].
References
Ananya panday start shooting her 13th film . Nepo kids keeps getting film even if all their films are flops and even if audience reject them
Post debates Ananya Panday's nepotism, film choices, and audiences' opinions on her talent and connections
View source