DuckDB is stepping into enterprise-scale territory: a report of running at 10 TB scale sparks a lively debate about embedded analytics for big workloads. The central question: can an embedded engine deliver solid performance without shipping data to a separate warehouse?
DuckDB at 10 TB scale The discussion centers on 10 TB scale as a proving ground for embedded analytics. It foregrounds performance and query efficiency when data grows large [1]. Proponents point to tight integration of analytics workloads, suggesting startup and query latency remain practical at scale.
Storage choices at scale Storage design becomes a make-or-break factor at 10 TB. The conversations explore cost, throughput, and data layout while staying anchored to the 10 TB benchmark [1]. Some weigh columnar formats and in-memory options as levers for throughput and cost.
Embedded vs traditional server warehouses Embedded engines aim to cut data movement and simplify pipelines, contrasting with server-based warehouses that keep data centralized. The talk weighs agility, governance, and total cost of ownership [1]. Critics raise concerns about multi-tenant governance and long-term scalability in enterprise setups.
Practical optimizations and challenges Participants flag practical optimizations—indexing, parallelism, and cache strategies—and also the inevitable hurdles of scale, such as maintenance and resilience [1]. The thread also mentions operational chores like backups and monitoring in embedded deployments.
Keep an eye on how real-world enterprises curate data and compare embedded analytics to classic warehouses as 10 TB-scale tests mature [1].
References
Running DuckDB at 10 TB scale
DuckDB deployment demonstrated at 10 terabytes, exploring performance, storage, and query efficiency at large scale with practical insights, challenges, optimizations.
View source