Schrödinger's App privacy? nails the mystery of identifiers and tracking in the App Store era. The conversation gains momentum as That Camera drops incognito capture on iOS, turning a privacy question into a feature debate. [1]
Policy landscape — The discussion centers on the App Store privacy framework and asks what counts as an 'identifier'—is an email or device info tracking you, or is a broader data set involved? The post points to a 'magic number' that stands in for you, while nobody knows who you really are. [1]
That Camera — Launched on the App Store as That Camera, it’s billed as the first incognito-style camera that lets you take pictures privately without showing your screen to others. [2] It uses a black screen cover, so it looks like your phone is off while still letting you capture the moment. [2]
“First thought: that’s something creeps will love.” [2] The creator even hints at upgrades, with an update that could darken the view to 85%. [2] And the thread riffs on privacy by calling it “an app version of the amazing Camp Snap camera device.” [2] Bold Camp Snap in praise or parody, the line underscores how on-device design feeds the privacy debate. [2]
Impact on policy and marketing — These choices show how policy and design shape what features apps can offer and how they’re marketed. Clearer identifiers and privacy disclosures will influence trust and adoption in iOS/macOS ecosystems. [1][2]
Closing thought: keep an eye on how App Store terms evolve around identifiers and incognito modes next. [1]
References
Schrödinger's App privacy?
Explores App Store privacy, whether apps track identifiers, and how identifiers link to users in iOS/macOS policies today.
View source🚀 Just launched “That Camera” a new iOS app that lets you take photos in incognito mode.
New iOS app That Camera launches; incognito photo mode, privacy concerns raised; comments compare to Camp Snap, suggest 85% darkening.
View source