Foreign-listed Indian subsidiaries like Hyundai and LG fetch premium valuations relative to their parent firms. The chatter asks: what’s driving the gap? The short answer points to India’s market dynamics: solid domestic demand, easier access to capital, and a growth-at-any-price mindset that lifts growth stories here [1].
Drivers behind the premium • Domestic demand and earnings visibility — India’s consumption surge translates into clearer growth paths for listed subsidiaries, nudging investors to assign higher multiples [1]. • Easier access to capital — A listed arm can tap Indian markets for expansion funds, reinforcing growth narratives and justifying richer valuations [1]. • Market dynamics and investor appetite — In a developing, shallower market, DIIs and Retailers often pay higher PEs (around 45-50) for these names, versus 15-20 by developed-market peers [1]. • Extreme sector examples — The discussion flags bottling firms trading at 100 PE and a food-delivery player at 1000 PE, illustrating how market structure can distort multiples [1].
Closing thought: the premium reflects India’s demand pull, capital access, and local investor zeal. If these levers shift, the valuation gap between foreign-listed Indian subsidiaries and their global parents could narrow or widen in step with policy and growth signals [1].
References
Why are foreign companies launching IPO in India are more valued than thier parent company?
Discusses why Indian-listed foreign subsidiaries fetch higher valuations than parents, citing consumption demand, capital access, and market dynamics.
View source