Mutual Funds vs Portfolio Management Services (PMS) in India: what investors are saying about costs and returns. In stock chatter, PMS promises big bets, with some funds claiming about 112% last year, while this year’s numbers are more mixed—one fund around 25% and many mutual funds near flat or negative [1]. Skeptics point out data gaps; PMS Bazaar tracks past performance, but CAGR figures aren’t the end‑all [1].
Costs matter, especially with high-cost models. Post 3 shows that some Smallcase strategies charge hefty fees—best ones around ₹500 per month, while many quote ₹700–₹800. On a ₹2 lakh portfolio, that can mean about 5% in fees [3].
From post 2, an investor lists a seven-fund MF mix: - Bandhan Small Cap Fund Direct Growth - Edelweiss US Technology Equity FoF Direct Growth - Nippon India Multi Cap Fund Direct Growth - Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund Direct Growth - Nippon India Large Cap Fund Direct Growth - SBI Gold Direct Plan Growth - Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund SIP minimum is ₹1,000 [2].
When might PMS justify higher fees? The chatter suggests niche or hedged strategies can justify a premium, but data access and performance consistency vary; CAGR alone isn’t a reliable guide [1]. Ordinary investors are urged to weigh costs vs potential gains and consider low-cost MF routes first [1].
Closing thought: start with transparent costs, verify data sources, and keep an eye on SIPs and long‑term fees before jumping into high-cost PMS or Smallcase bets [2][3].
References
Top Portfolio Managed Funds
Compares PMS and mutual funds; seeks studies and past data; highlights 112% and 25% returns, long-short in sideways markets, recent
View sourcePortfolio Review
New investor shares mutual fund choices, seeks guidance on allocation and evaluation of Indian funds
View sourceReview on FinnovationZ
Discussion on FinnovationZ Smallcase Value Investing; fee critique labels it high-cost MF-like, returns questionable; others partly agree, investment opinions unclear.
View source