Retail IPO Frenzy: Allocation, Listing Day Realities, and Long-Term Value

IPO hype is back, but the chatter often clashes with what actually shows up after listing. Oversubscription is the default, described as oversubscribed until it isn’t ^[4]. That gap between listing-time buzz and long-term reality matters for everyday investors.

Allocation realities and risk — Allocation isn’t guaranteed. In the Lenskart IPO, funds and retirement money reportedly flowed in, sparking questions about fund evaluation standards and manager prudence ^[2]. The crowd included names like SBI Innovative Opportunities Fund, SBI Focused Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund - HDFC Innovation Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund - HDFC Non Cyclical Consumer Fund, HDFC Large and Mid Cap Fund, ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund, ICICI Prudential Equity & Debt Fund, and ICICI Prudential Multicap Fund (with participation also noted from global players such as Government of Singapore and T. Rowe Price International Discovery Fund) ^[2].

Valuation concerns — The Lenskart pricing looks stretched: a rumored P/E around 535x and an 8x profit jump for the founder in four months. Much of the headline profit relies on non-operating income like FVTPL gains, prompting questions about true profitability ^[3].

Oversubscription dynamics — The hype-y signal can mislead, as listing-day oversubscription doesn’t guarantee post-listing gains or sustainable value ^[4].

Regulator and fairness critiques — Critics blame SEBI for lax IPO gates and worry about public money backing IPOs, calling for tighter rules and better investor guardrails ^[5].

Post-listing outcomes — Urban Company’s Q2 shows a net loss of ₹593.3M on revenue ₹3.8B, with revenue up year-on-year but losses widening, fueling questions about long-term value after the IPO bloom ^[6].

Bottom line: hype can stoke a frenzy, but real value hinges on durable profits and disciplined allocation.

References