Back to topics

Local Deployment vs Cloud: Hardware Choices Redefine LLM Use in 2025

1 min read
253 words
Opinions on LLMs Local Deployment

Local deployment vs cloud isn’t a vibe—it's a hardware math problem. The 2025 headline is clear: Apple’s M5 promises blistering on-device LLMs, while DGX Spark benchmarks lay out real-world home-lab constraints—VRAM, speed, and cost [1][2].

Key hardware levers today - Apple M5 — up to 150GB/s unified memory bandwidth; faster SSD performance and up to 4TB of storage; tests show about a 3.5x speedup for prompt processing [1]. - These gains come with tradeoffs: memory bandwidth and storage headroom drive how big a model you can actually steady-run locally.

Home-lab realities - DGX Spark benchmarks spell out real-world constraints for a home lab: VRAM ceilings, thermal envelopes, and price, with tests showing long runtimes and notable power draw in practice [2]. - In some tests, 131072-token contexts maxed ~90GB VRAM, illustrating why giants still lean cloud if you need long contexts [2].

Local Qwen3-Next-80B vs FastLLM vs llama.cpp - Quick local run of Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct-Q4KM on Windows is possible with FastLLM—about 6 GB VRAM and 48 GB RAM, delivering ~8 tokens/sec; setup contrasts with llama.cpp workflows and even includes CUDA memory hiccups in some configs [3].

Hybrid architectures in the wild - The paper Hybrid Architectures for Language Models: Systematic Analysis and Design Insights maps out when hybrid designs with Mamba-style blocks win long-context tasks, weighing inter-layer vs intra-layer fusion and offering practical design recipes [4].

Bottom line: local inference can work for lean, targeted tasks on strong hardware, but for massive, long-context models, cloud or hybrid approaches remain the practical route in 2025.

References

[1]
Reddit

Apple unveils M5

Discusses M5's AI performance for local LLMs, memory bandwidth, RAM options; compares to M4/M1; debates prompt processing vs bandwidth tradeoffs

View source
[2]
Reddit

Got the DGX Spark - ask me anything

Benchmarks DGX Spark; discusses LLMs like GPT-OSS-120B; compares VRAM, speed, training vs inference; critiques cost and practicality for home labs

View source
[3]
Reddit

Quick Guide: Running Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M Locally with FastLLM (Windows)

User tests FastLLM locally on Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M, compares to llama.cpp, sharing setup, performance, and memory observations.

View source
[4]
Reddit

Hybrid Architectures for Language Models: Systematic Analysis and Design Insights

Presents systematic evaluation of hybrid LLM architectures (inter-layer or intra-layer fusion) balancing modeling quality and efficiency; seeks practical design guidelines.

View source

Want to track your own topics?

Create custom trackers and get AI-powered insights from social discussions

Get Started